Devoy v. World Duty Free (Europe) Ltd [2000] UKEAT 59_00_2711 (27 November 2000)
The Employment Tribunal misdirected itself by applying a reasonableness test rather than determining whether the respondent breached the express term (Clause 7.6) requiring appeals to be heard as soon as practicable. The case must be remitted to the tribunal to decide if the delay constituted a breach and if it was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 59_00_2711
- Parties
- Appellant: Mrs Devoy; Respondent: Respondent (unnamed employer)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing – Ex Parte
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; matter remitted to Employment Tribunal for further hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Unfair Dismissal, Breach of Contract, Implied Terms, Disciplinary Procedures, Appeal Process
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Devoy
Appellant
Respondent (unnamed employer)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing – Ex Parte
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether delay in hearing disciplinary appeal constituted breach of contract justifying constructive dismissal
- 2 Whether respondent breached express term requiring appeals to be heard as soon as practicable
- 3 Whether delay was sufficiently serious to amount to constructive dismissal
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal misdirected itself by applying a reasonableness test rather than determining whether the respondent breached the express term (Clause 7.6) requiring appeals to be heard as soon as practicable. The case must be remitted to the tribunal to decide if the delay constituted a breach and if it was sufficiently serious to amount to constructive dismissal.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; matter remitted to Employment Tribunal for further hearing.
Orders
- Remit to same Employment Tribunal (if possible) to decide if respondent breached Clause 7.6 and if breach was sufficiently serious to amount to constructive dismissal.
- No order for costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment