Environmental Services Ltd v Dyke & Anor [1997] UKEAT 93_96_1003 (10 March 1997)
Regulation 5 of the 1981 Regulations operates as a statutory novation, automatically transferring the employment contract to the transferee regardless of whether the employee knows the transferee's identity. Mr Dyke was assigned to the part of the undertaking transferred, so his contract transferred to Mr McBride. The dismissal by MRS was for a reason connected with the transfer and is automatically unfair under Regulation 8(1), but liability attaches only to the transferee, not the transferor.
- Citation
- [1997] UKEAT 93_96_1003
- Parties
- Appellant: MRS Environmental Services Ltd; Applicant: Mr Dyke; 2nd Respondent: Mr McBride
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; liability for unfair dismissal attaches to the transferee (Mr McBride) alone.
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Undertakings, Unfair Dismissal, Statutory Novation, Employee Rights, Automatic Transfer of Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MRS Environmental Services Ltd
Appellant
Mr Dyke
Applicant
Mr McBride
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Dyke was assigned to the part of the undertaking transferred under the 1981 Regulations
- 2 Whether knowledge of the transferee's identity is required for automatic transfer of employment contract under Regulation 5
- 3 Whether the dismissal was automatically unfair under Regulation 8(1)
Ratio Decidendi
Regulation 5 of the 1981 Regulations operates as a statutory novation, automatically transferring the employment contract to the transferee regardless of whether the employee knows the transferee's identity. Mr Dyke was assigned to the part of the undertaking transferred, so his contract transferred to Mr McBride. The dismissal by MRS was for a reason connected with the transfer and is automatically unfair under Regulation 8(1), but liability attaches only to the transferee, not the transferor.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; liability for unfair dismissal attaches to the transferee (Mr McBride) alone.
Orders
- Case remitted to the same tribunal to consider remedies against Mr McBride alone.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment