Evesham v North Hertfordshire Health Authority & Anor [1998] UKEAT 1354_97_0209 (2 September 1998)
Mrs Evesham is entitled to have her contract modified so as to be not less favourable than her comparator; she mirrors the comparator on the incremental scale at the relevant date and enjoys the same contractual entitlement to incremental progression as the comparator.
- Citation
- [1998] UKEAT 1354_97_0209
- Parties
- Appellant: Mrs Evesham; Comparator: Dr Mollan; Respondent: The Respondents
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 02 September 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Industrial Tribunal Remedy Decision
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Equal Pay, Remedy, Incremental Pay Scale, Comparators
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Evesham
Appellant
Dr Mollan
Comparator
The Respondents
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Industrial Tribunal Remedy Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mrs Evesham should enter the comparator's pay scale at the incremental level reflecting her years in post or at the comparator's current level
- 2 Whether arrears of pay should be calculated at the incremental level reflecting Mrs Evesham's years in post or at the comparator's level
Ratio Decidendi
Mrs Evesham is entitled to have her contract modified so as to be not less favourable than her comparator; she mirrors the comparator on the incremental scale at the relevant date and enjoys the same contractual entitlement to incremental progression as the comparator.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Mrs Evesham's contract to be modified to mirror comparator's incremental scale at relevant date
- Arrears of pay to be calculated at comparator's incremental level
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment