Grewal v. Northamptonshire County Council [2000] EAT 305_99_1502 (15 February 2000)
The Tribunal was entitled to consider only the claim for victimisation under section 2 of the Race Relations Act 1976, as that was the only claim advanced by the Appellant. The Tribunal properly considered whether there was any evidence of a protected act or direct discrimination and found none. The appeal is dismissed as there was no error in law or approach by the Tribunal.
- Citation
- [2000] EAT 305_99_1502
- Parties
- Appellant: Mrs Grewal; Respondent: Northamptonshire County Council
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Employment Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Racial Discrimination, Victimisation, Direct Discrimination, Constructive Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Grewal
Appellant
Northamptonshire County Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Employment Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred by considering only victimisation under section 2 of the Race Relations Act 1976 and not direct discrimination under section 1
- 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to consider relevant evidence or reached an unreasonable decision
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was entitled to consider only the claim for victimisation under section 2 of the Race Relations Act 1976, as that was the only claim advanced by the Appellant. The Tribunal properly considered whether there was any evidence of a protected act or direct discrimination and found none. The appeal is dismissed as there was no error in law or approach by the Tribunal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment