Johnson v. Camden & Islington Community Health Services NHS Trust & Ors [2001] UKEAT 900_01_1012 (10 December 2001)
There is an arguable case that the Tribunal erred in law by not following established guidance and failing to scrutinise the Respondents' explanations or make necessary factual findings under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 900_01_1012
- Parties
- Appellant: Mrs Johnson; Respondents: Camden & Islington Community Health NHS Trust and others
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Ex Parte Hearing on Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted on specified grounds
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination Act 1995, Employment Tribunal Procedure, Grounds of Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Johnson
Appellant
Camden & Islington Community Health NHS Trust and others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Ex Parte Hearing on Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law by failing to follow guidance in Morse v Wiltshire County Council
- 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to scrutinise the Respondents' explanations under sections 5(2) and 5(4) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995
- 3 Whether the Tribunal failed to find appropriate facts regarding the Respondents' decision-making
Ratio Decidendi
There is an arguable case that the Tribunal erred in law by not following established guidance and failing to scrutinise the Respondents' explanations or make necessary factual findings under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted on specified grounds
Orders
- Appellant to submit further amended grounds of appeal within 14 days if desired
- Respondents may object to full hearing of the appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment