MacLeod v University Court of the University of Glasgow [2019] UKEAT 19_0022_1610 (16 October 2019)
The appeal is refused because the Employment Appeal Tribunal lacks the power to reopen Employment Tribunal orders on the basis of new evidence of expert misconduct, and there is insufficient concrete evidence of misconduct in the appellant's case to justify any remedy.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] UKEAT 19_0022_1610
- Parties
- Appellant: Mrs M MacLeod; Respondent: Unknown Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Strike Out of Claim, Expert Evidence, Procedural Irregularity, Appeal Procedure
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs M MacLeod
Appellant
Unknown Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether new evidence of expert's misconduct justifies reopening Employment Tribunal orders
- 2 Whether procedural rules allow reopening of orders based on new evidence
- 3 Whether appellant's complaints about expert report were raised in time
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is refused because the Employment Appeal Tribunal lacks the power to reopen Employment Tribunal orders on the basis of new evidence of expert misconduct, and there is insufficient concrete evidence of misconduct in the appellant's case to justify any remedy.
Court Disposition
Appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment