McCleary v McKeag & Company [1996] UKEAT 1163_95_2003 (20 March 1996)
The tribunal found that although there was a breach of an implied term regarding supervision, the appellant did not resign in response to that breach but rather due to a desire for higher pay. Therefore, there was no constructive or unfair dismissal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1996] UKEAT 1163_95_2003
- Parties
- Appellant: Mrs McCleary; Respondent: Respondents (unnamed)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Unfair Dismissal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs McCleary
Appellant
Respondents (unnamed)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was constructively dismissed within the meaning of Section 55 of the 1978 Act
- 2 Whether the appellant was unfairly dismissed under Section 54(1) of the 1978 Act
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that although there was a breach of an implied term regarding supervision, the appellant did not resign in response to that breach but rather due to a desire for higher pay. Therefore, there was no constructive or unfair dismissal.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment