Nutley v. Thames Valley University [2000] UKEAT 705_00_0111 (1 November 2000)
There is an arguable case that the tribunal erred in law by failing to consider the applicant's arguments regarding pressure and lack of choice in termination, and by not properly addressing whether the University was estopped from limiting notice to three months based on management statements and contractual criteria.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 705_00_0111
- Parties
- Appellant: Mrs Nutley; Respondent: Thames Valley University
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 01 November 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Ex Parte Hearing
- Outcome
- Matter directed to full hearing of appeal on two points.
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy, Notice Period, Dismissal, Mutual Agreement, Estoppel
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Nutley
Appellant
Thames Valley University
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Ex Parte Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mrs Nutley was unfairly selected for redundancy or dismissed under pressure
- 2 Whether Mrs Nutley was entitled to twelve months' notice or only three months' notice on redundancy
- 3 Whether the University was estopped from limiting notice to three months
Ratio Decidendi
There is an arguable case that the tribunal erred in law by failing to consider the applicant's arguments regarding pressure and lack of choice in termination, and by not properly addressing whether the University was estopped from limiting notice to three months based on management statements and contractual criteria.
Court Disposition
Matter directed to full hearing of appeal on two points.
Orders
- Appellant to file amended Notice of Appeal within 14 days raising both points.
- Case to be listed as Category C for half a day.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment