May & Anor v. Harrison [2003] UKEAT 0128_03_2810 (28 October 2003)
The Tribunal's reasoning on key aspects of compensation was inadequate, specifically regarding the 2.5% discount, exclusion of occupational pension, and mitigation deductions. The appeal is allowed and the matter is remitted for rehearing on compensation assessment.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2003] UKEAT 0128_03_2810
- Parties
- Applicant: Mrs O Harrison; Respondents: Medical Practitioners Partnership (Respondents)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Employment Tribunal's Compensation Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; matter remitted to same Tribunal for rehearing on compensation assessment.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Sex Discrimination, Compensation Assessment, Mitigation of Loss, Pension Loss
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs O Harrison
Applicant
Medical Practitioners Partnership (Respondents)
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Employment Tribunal's Compensation Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in assessing compensation for future losses following unfair dismissal and sex discrimination
- 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to provide adequate reasons for its compensation calculation
- 3 Whether occupational pension benefits should have been considered in the compensation assessment
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's reasoning on key aspects of compensation was inadequate, specifically regarding the 2.5% discount, exclusion of occupational pension, and mitigation deductions. The appeal is allowed and the matter is remitted for rehearing on compensation assessment.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; matter remitted to same Tribunal for rehearing on compensation assessment.
Orders
- Matter remitted to same Tribunal for rehearing with evidence if Tribunal chooses.
- Respondents to apply for a one-day hearing before same Tribunal unless impracticable, in which case a fresh Tribunal will hear the matter.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment