O'Shea v. Royal Hospital NHS Trust [2000] UKEAT 1279_99_1801 (18 January 2000)
The Tribunal provided adequate reasons for its decision, and was not required to address every evidential point; no arguable point of law arises.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 1279_99_1801
- Parties
- Appellant: Mrs O'Shea; Respondent: Bart's Hospital Trust
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal Appeal / Preliminary Hearing – Ex Parte
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Racial Discrimination, Harassment, Tribunal Reasoning
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mrs O'Shea
Appellant
Bart's Hospital Trust
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal Appeal / Preliminary Hearing – Ex Parte
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal provided adequate reasons for its decision dismissing the complaint of racial discrimination
- 2 Whether the Tribunal misdirected itself by adopting Ms Slater's report and failing to address contradictory evidence or Mr Ahmed's memorandum
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal provided adequate reasons for its decision, and was not required to address every evidential point; no arguable point of law arises.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No further hearing; appeal does not raise an arguable point of law
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment