Solloway v. HPC Engineering Plc [2001] UKEAT 1192_99_2304 (23 April 2001)
The appeal fails because the claim based on paragraph 4.62 of the Code was not pleaded or argued before the Employment Tribunal, and the Tribunal's findings of fact were supported by the evidence. Paragraph 4.62 of the Code is not relevant to the applicant's pleaded claim under Section 5(1) DDA.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 1192_99_2304
- Parties
- Appellant: Mrs Solloway; Respondent: HPC Engineering Plc
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination Act 1995, Unfair Dismissal, Redundancy, Reasonable Adjustments, Employment Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Solloway
Appellant
HPC Engineering Plc
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in dismissing the applicant's complaint under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995
- 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to have regard to paragraph 4.62 of the Code of Practice regarding knowledge of disability
- 3 Whether findings of fact by the Tribunal were contrary to the evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal fails because the claim based on paragraph 4.62 of the Code was not pleaded or argued before the Employment Tribunal, and the Tribunal's findings of fact were supported by the evidence. Paragraph 4.62 of the Code is not relevant to the applicant's pleaded claim under Section 5(1) DDA.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment