Ako v. Rothschild Asset Management Ltd & Ors [2000] UKEAT 103_00_3103 (31 March 2000)
The appeal raises arguable points under Article 6(1) ECHR and regarding continuing acts of discrimination, warranting a full hearing.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 103_00_3103
- Parties
- Appellant: Ms Ako; First Respondent: Rothschild Asset Management Ltd; Second Respondent: Mellon Bank
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed to proceed to full hearing
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Redundancy, Transfer of Undertakings, Cause of Action Estoppel, Article 6 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Parties
Ms Ako
Appellant
Rothschild Asset Management Ltd
First Respondent
Mellon Bank
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether cause of action estoppel bars the appellant from pursuing the second application against the first respondent
- 2 Whether Article 6(1) ECHR provides grounds to challenge the estoppel
- 3 Whether complaints about continuing acts of discrimination survive the withdrawal of the first application
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal raises arguable points under Article 6(1) ECHR and regarding continuing acts of discrimination, warranting a full hearing.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed to proceed to full hearing
Orders
- Full appeal to be listed for one day, Category A
- Exchange of skeleton arguments not less than 14 days before hearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment