Kaur v. John L Brierly Ltd [2000] EAT 102_00_2601 (26 January 2000)

Kaur v. John L Brierly Ltd [2000] EAT 102_00_2601 (26 January 2000)

The Chairman acted within his discretion under Rule 13 in refusing the amendment, as the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear a breach of contract claim while the contract was continuing. There was no requirement for an oral hearing in these circumstances.

Citation
[2000] EAT 102_00_2601
Parties
Appellant: Ms C K Kaur; Respondent: John L Brierly Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
26 January 2000
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Breach of Contract, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Jurisdiction of Employment Tribunal
Employment Law Amendment of Pleadings Breach of Contract Unlawful Deduction From Wages Jurisdiction of Employment Tribunal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ms C K Kaur

Appellant

John L Brierly Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal Chairman erred in refusing leave to amend the Originating Application to include a breach of contract claim while the contract was continuing
  2. 2 Whether the Chairman was required to hold an oral hearing before refusing the amendment

Ratio Decidendi

The Chairman acted within his discretion under Rule 13 in refusing the amendment, as the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear a breach of contract claim while the contract was continuing. There was no requirement for an oral hearing in these circumstances.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed