Nordic ID Oy v Ms Camilla Danks (Full Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 16948 (05 April 2016)

Nordic ID Oy v Ms Camilla Danks (Full Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 16948 (05 April 2016)

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and mark, that the domain name was identical or similar, and that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy. The respondent failed to demonstrate rights or legitimate interests in the domain name.

Citation
[2016] DRS 16948
Parties
Complainant: Nordic ID Oy; Respondent: Ms Camilla Danks
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
05 April 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nordic ID Oy

Complainant

Ms Camilla Danks

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in the domain name

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and mark, that the domain name was identical or similar, and that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy. The respondent failed to demonstrate rights or legitimate interests in the domain name.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.