Catanzano v Studio London Ltd & Ors (Sex Discrimination : Injury to feelings) [2012] UKEAT 0487_11_0703 (07 March 2012)
Compensation for sex discrimination and loss of earnings must be joint and several against all responsible respondents where loss is indivisible; uplift for breach of ACAS Code applies only to employer responsible for grievance handling.
- Citation
- [2012] UKEAT 0487_11_0703
- Parties
- Appellant: Ms Catanzano; First Respondent: Studio London Ltd; Second Respondent: Mrs McMillan; Third Respondent: Mr Ward
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal Tribunal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Judgment (remedy Section)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sex Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Remedies, Apportionment of Liability, Injury to Feelings, Loss of Earnings, Unlawful Deductions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms Catanzano
Appellant
Studio London Ltd
First Respondent
Mrs McMillan
Second Respondent
Mr Ward
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal Tribunal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Judgment (remedy Section)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether compensation for sex discrimination should be joint and several between respondents
- 2 Whether 25% uplift applies to individual respondents
- 3 Whether compensation for loss of earnings should be awarded under sex discrimination claim on joint and several basis
Ratio Decidendi
Compensation for sex discrimination and loss of earnings must be joint and several against all responsible respondents where loss is indivisible; uplift for breach of ACAS Code applies only to employer responsible for grievance handling.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Award for injury to feelings (£3,000) to be joint and several against all three respondents
- Award for loss of earnings to be joint and several against all three respondents under sex discrimination head
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment