Chouaou v Kensington & Chelsea College & Ors [1998] UKEAT 301_97_0402 (4 February 1998)

Chouaou v Kensington & Chelsea College & Ors [1998] UKEAT 301_97_0402 (4 February 1998)

There was no arguable point of law for appeal as the Industrial Tribunal had properly considered the evidence, afforded procedural fairness, and made findings within its jurisdiction, preferring the respondents' evidence over the appellant's.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1998] UKEAT 301_97_0402
Parties
Appellant: Ms Chouaou; First Respondent: Kensington and Chelsea College; Second Respondent: Ms Rettie; Third Respondent: Mr Deidier
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
04 February 1998
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing Ex Parte
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Unfair Dismissal, Race Discrimination, Procedural Fairness, Limitation Periods
Employment Law Discrimination Law Unfair Dismissal Race Discrimination Procedural Fairness Limitation Periods

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ms Chouaou

Appellant

Kensington and Chelsea College

First Respondent

Ms Rettie

Second Respondent

Mr Deidier

Third Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing Ex Parte

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Industrial Tribunal erred in law in rejecting the complaints of race discrimination and unfair dismissal
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was denied the opportunity to present her case regarding the authenticity of register entries
  3. 3 Whether the dismissal was fair and within the band of reasonable responses

Ratio Decidendi

There was no arguable point of law for appeal as the Industrial Tribunal had properly considered the evidence, afforded procedural fairness, and made findings within its jurisdiction, preferring the respondents' evidence over the appellant's.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No further hearing; appeal disposed of at preliminary stage