Cunningham v. Quedos Ltd & Anor [2003] UKEAT 0298_03_2008 (20 August 2003)
The appeal is arguable only on the grounds of whether the Tribunal properly applied the reversed burden of proof under section 63A and whether it made sufficient findings of fact on knowing assistance; all other grounds are unarguable or adequately addressed by the Tribunal.
- Citation
- [2003] UKEAT 0298_03_2008
- Parties
- Appellant: Ms Cunningham (Mrs McNally); Second Respondent: Wyeth; Employer/first Respondent (compromised): Quedos
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Appeal
- Outcome
- Partial grant of permission to appeal
- Legal Topics
- Sex Discrimination, Burden of Proof, Employment Status, Assistance in Discrimination, Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms Cunningham (Mrs McNally)
Appellant
Wyeth
Second Respondent
Quedos
Employer/first Respondent (compromised)
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal applied the correct section of the Sex Discrimination Act
- 2 Whether the Tribunal properly applied the reversed burden of proof under section 63A
- 3 Whether the Tribunal misdirected itself regarding the applicant's case
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is arguable only on the grounds of whether the Tribunal properly applied the reversed burden of proof under section 63A and whether it made sufficient findings of fact on knowing assistance; all other grounds are unarguable or adequately addressed by the Tribunal.
Court Disposition
Partial grant of permission to appeal
Orders
- Matter set down for full hearing on grounds 2 and 4 (burden of proof and findings of fact on knowing assistance)
- Time estimate for hearing is one day; parties to notify Tribunal if they disagree
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment