Griffin v. Business Employment Services Training Ltd [2001] UKEAT 0161_01_2610 (26 October 2001)
The Tribunal was entitled to strike out the applicant's claim for failure to comply with directions, as the failure was not properly explained, caused prejudice to the respondent, and the applicant retained alternative remedies. There was no error of law or breach of Article 6.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 0161_01_2610
- Parties
- Appellant: Ms Griffin; Respondent: Unknown Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal Appeal / Preliminary Ex Parte Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Strike Out of Claim, Non Compliance With Tribunal Directions, Prejudice, Right to Fair Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms Griffin
Appellant
Unknown Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal Appeal / Preliminary Ex Parte Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in striking out the applicant's claim for failure to comply with directions
- 2 Whether the failure to comply was contumelious or flagrant
- 3 Whether striking out the claim breached Article 6 (right to a fair trial)
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was entitled to strike out the applicant's claim for failure to comply with directions, as the failure was not properly explained, caused prejudice to the respondent, and the applicant retained alternative remedies. There was no error of law or breach of Article 6.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed at the preliminary stage.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment