Hardwick v. Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust & Anor [2000] UKEAT 556_00_2310 (23 October 2000)
There is an arguable case that the tribunal failed in its duty to make appropriate enquiries of a litigant in person and may have erred in its assessment of disability, warranting a full hearing on these points.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 556_00_2310
- Parties
- Appellant: Ms Hardwick; Respondent: Respondents
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Ex Parte Hearing
- Outcome
- Partial leave granted for full hearing on procedural perversity and general perversity; leave refused on admission of further evidence.
- Legal Topics
- Definition of Disability, Procedural Fairness, Admission of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms Hardwick
Appellant
Respondents
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Ex Parte Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tribunal failed in its duty to make appropriate enquiries of a litigant in person
- 2 Whether the tribunal's decision that post viral syndrome/ME/CFS did not amount to a disability was perverse
- 3 Whether the tribunal erred in refusing to admit further medical evidence after the close of evidence
Ratio Decidendi
There is an arguable case that the tribunal failed in its duty to make appropriate enquiries of a litigant in person and may have erred in its assessment of disability, warranting a full hearing on these points.
Court Disposition
Partial leave granted for full hearing on procedural perversity and general perversity; leave refused on admission of further evidence.
Orders
- Chairman to provide notes of Ms Hardwick's evidence and comment on tribunal's conduct regarding paragraphs 12 and 13
- Ms Hardwick to submit amended Notice of Appeal within 14 days limited to procedural perversity and general perversity
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment