Aston Barclay v Ms Hazel Barrett (Full Decision _No Action) [2018] DRS 20278 (08 August 2018)

Aston Barclay v Ms Hazel Barrett (Full Decision _No Action) [2018] DRS 20278 (08 August 2018)

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the respondent's registration or use of the domain name was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2018] DRS 20278
Parties
Complainant: Aston Barclay; Respondent: Ms Hazel Barrett
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
08 August 2018
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Outcome
complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Aston Barclay

Complainant

Ms Hazel Barrett

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's registration of the domain name infringes the complainant's rights
  2. 2 Whether the domain name was registered or used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the respondent's registration or use of the domain name was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

complaint denied

Orders

  • No action to be taken regarding the domain name