Logan v. Customs & Excise [2000] UKEAT 686_00_1011 (10 November 2000)
There are arguable points of appeal regarding whether the Tribunal erred in dismissing the claim at the conclusion of the applicant's case, failed to provide sufficient reasons for its findings on the 'last straw' incidents, and misapplied the principles from Lewis v Motorworld.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 686_00_1011
- Parties
- Appellant: Ms J Logan; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Last Straw Doctrine, Waiver of Breach, Sufficiency of Reasons
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms J Logan
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in dismissing the claim at the conclusion of the applicant's case
- 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to provide sufficient reasons regarding the 'last straw' incidents
- 3 Whether the Tribunal misapplied the principles from Lewis v Motorworld regarding cumulative breaches and the last straw doctrine
Ratio Decidendi
There are arguable points of appeal regarding whether the Tribunal erred in dismissing the claim at the conclusion of the applicant's case, failed to provide sufficient reasons for its findings on the 'last straw' incidents, and misapplied the principles from Lewis v Motorworld.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted
Orders
- Ms Logan granted leave to amend her Notice of Appeal within 28 days to incorporate additional grounds
- Chairman's Notes of the Appellant's evidence to be provided to the Employment Appeal Tribunal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment