Bit'er Sweet Hog v Ms Louise Gilmartin (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2019] DRS 21776 (01 November 2019)

The panel found that the complainant satisfied the requirements of the Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name to the complainant.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2019] DRS 21776
Parties: Complainant: Bit'er Sweet Hog; Respondent: Ms Louise Gilmartin
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 01 November 2019
Procedural Posture: Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome: Transfer ordered
Legal Topics: Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off

Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Passing Off

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Bit'er Sweet Hog

Complainant

Ms Louise Gilmartin

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

1 Whether the domain name should be transferred to the complainant

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant satisfied the requirements of the Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name to the complainant.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.