Sosta v. Grant Thornton [2001] UKEAT 0147_01_1106 (11 June 2001)

Sosta v. Grant Thornton [2001] UKEAT 0147_01_1106 (11 June 2001)

The Tribunal found that Ms Sosta's evidence did not establish a fundamental breach of contract by the employer, and the process was fair; thus, there was no constructive dismissal or breach of natural justice.

Citation
[2001] UKEAT 0147_01_1106
Parties
Appellant: Ms Mandy Sosta; Respondent: Grant Thornton
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
11 June 2001
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Constructive Dismissal, Unfair Dismissal, Natural Justice, Fair Trial, Human Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ms Mandy Sosta

Appellant

Grant Thornton

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

  1. 1 Whether Ms Sosta was constructively dismissed by Grant Thornton
  2. 2 Whether the Employment Tribunal failed to provide a fair hearing in accordance with Article 6 of the Human Rights Act and the European Convention on Human Rights

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that Ms Sosta's evidence did not establish a fundamental breach of contract by the employer, and the process was fair; thus, there was no constructive dismissal or breach of natural justice.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed