O'Neill v. Wesson [2001] UKEAT 1140_00_3011 (30 November 2001)
Mrs Wesson did not give lawful notice as required by the contract; therefore, Ms O'Neill was not in breach and owed no further sums.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 1140_00_3011
- Parties
- Appellant: Ms O'Neill; Respondent: Mrs Wesson
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Notice Period, Termination of Employment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Ms O'Neill
Appellant
Mrs Wesson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mrs Wesson gave lawful notice under her employment contract
- 2 Whether Ms O'Neill was in breach of contract for not paying further sums to Mrs Wesson
Ratio Decidendi
Mrs Wesson did not give lawful notice as required by the contract; therefore, Ms O'Neill was not in breach and owed no further sums.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Decision of the Employment Tribunal set aside
- No further sums owed to Mrs Wesson
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment