Akers v. Whicker [2000] UKEAT 342_00_1107 (11 July 2000)

Akers v. Whicker [2000] UKEAT 342_00_1107 (11 July 2000)

The Tribunal's findings on mitigation and compensation were supported by adequate evidence and not perverse; no error of law or fact was disclosed.

Citation
[2000] UKEAT 342_00_1107
Parties
Appellant: Ms Pritchard; Respondent: Miss Whicker
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
11 July 2000
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal
Outcome
appeal and cross-appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Compensation, Mitigation of Loss, Remedy
Employment Law Compensation Mitigation of Loss Remedy

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ms Pritchard

Appellant

Miss Whicker

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 adequacy of compensation award
  2. 2 mitigation of loss
  3. 3 error of law or perverse decision

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal's findings on mitigation and compensation were supported by adequate evidence and not perverse; no error of law or fact was disclosed.

Court Disposition

appeal and cross-appeal dismissed