Revolution Inc. Ltd Breathe Pilates Ltd v Ms Robyn Brockie (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 17546 (07 July 2016)
The Panel found that the Complainants had rights in the name, the Respondent had no legitimate interest, and the domain was registered and used in bad faith, warranting transfer.
- Citation
- [2016] DRS 17546
- Parties
- Complainant: Revolution Inc. Ltd; Complainant: Breathe Pilates Ltd; Respondent: Ms Robyn Brockie
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
- Outcome
- Transfer ordered
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trademark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Revolution Inc. Ltd
Complainant
Breathe Pilates Ltd
Complainant
Ms Robyn Brockie
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the Complainant has rights
- 2 Whether the Respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
- 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith
Ratio Decidendi
The Panel found that the Complainants had rights in the name, the Respondent had no legitimate interest, and the domain was registered and used in bad faith, warranting transfer.
Court Disposition
Transfer ordered
Orders
- The domain name is to be transferred to the Complainants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment