Miss S Cowell v Ms Sian John and others (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Sex Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2017] UKET 1600029/2017 (21 September 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, subjected to sex discrimination, and suffered unlawful deduction from wages, constituting a breach of contract.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 1600029/2017
Parties: Claimant: Miss S Cowell; Respondent: Ms Sian John and others
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 21 September 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld in part
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, Sex Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages

Employment Law Breach of Contract Sex Discrimination Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction From Wages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Miss S Cowell

Claimant

Ms Sian John and others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
2 Whether there was sex discrimination
3 Whether there was a breach of contract

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, subjected to sex discrimination, and suffered unlawful deduction from wages, constituting a breach of contract.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld in part

Orders

Compensation awarded to the claimant for unfair dismissal, sex discrimination, breach of contract, and unlawful deduction from wages

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.