Williams v Cater Link Ltd [2009] UKEAT 0393_08_2307 (23 July 2009)
The judge's prior professional relationship with respondent's counsel was minimal, not ongoing, and not sufficient to require recusal. The judge's conduct did not demonstrate actual or apparent bias. The strike out of the holiday pay claim was procedurally incorrect as an unless order should have been imposed first.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] UKEAT 0393_08_2307
- Parties
- Appellant: Ms Williams; Respondent: Caterlink Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed except for the holiday pay claim, which is reinstated for hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Bias, Recusal of Judge, Strike Out Applications, Unfair Dismissal, Race Discrimination, Holiday Pay
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms Williams
Appellant
Caterlink Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Judge was actually or apparently biased
- 2 Whether the prior professional relationship between the judge and respondent's counsel required recusal
- 3 Whether the strike out of the holiday pay claim was procedurally correct
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's prior professional relationship with respondent's counsel was minimal, not ongoing, and not sufficient to require recusal. The judge's conduct did not demonstrate actual or apparent bias. The strike out of the holiday pay claim was procedurally incorrect as an unless order should have been imposed first.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed except for the holiday pay claim, which is reinstated for hearing.
Orders
- Allegation of bias rejected; appeal dismissed on that ground.
- Strike out of holiday pay claim set aside; claim to proceed if further information provided within 21 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment