Wood v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 288 (TC) (25 June 2010)

Wood v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 288 (TC) (25 June 2010)

The payment to the appellant was made in settlement of prospective claims under a Compromise Agreement and not as contractual earnings or commission; therefore, the first £30,000 qualifies for exemption under Section 401 ITEPA 2003, with only the balance taxable.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] UKFTT 288 (TC)
Parties
Appellant: N J Wood; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
25 June 2010
Procedural Posture
Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Income Tax, Termination Payments, Compromise Agreements, Tax Exemptions
Tax Law Employment Law Income Tax Termination Payments Compromise Agreements Tax Exemptions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

N J Wood

Appellant

The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the termination payment made to the appellant is taxable as earnings or qualifies as a tax-free lump sum under Section 401 ITEPA 2003

Ratio Decidendi

The payment to the appellant was made in settlement of prospective claims under a Compromise Agreement and not as contractual earnings or commission; therefore, the first £30,000 qualifies for exemption under Section 401 ITEPA 2003, with only the balance taxable.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • HMRC to amend the self assessment form to allow £30,000 of the £37,424 payment to be exempt from tax, with the remaining £7,424 taxable.