Chris Johnston v Nadia Iqbal (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2011] DRS 9992 (04 August 2011)

Chris Johnston v Nadia Iqbal (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2011] DRS 9992 (04 August 2011)

The complainant satisfied all three elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy, and the domain name should be transferred.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2011] DRS 9992
Parties
Complainant: Chris Johnston; Respondent: Nadia Iqbal
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
04 August 2011
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Domain name transferred to complainant
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Passing Off Trade Mark Infringement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chris Johnston

Complainant

Nadia Iqbal

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant satisfied all three elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy, and the domain name should be transferred.

Court Disposition

Domain name transferred to complainant

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant