Compagnie Générale Des Etablissements Michelin v Nadine Elghool (Full Decision _Transfer) [2020] DRS 23052 (10 December 2020)

Compagnie Générale Des Etablissements Michelin v Nadine Elghool (Full Decision _Transfer) [2020] DRS 23052 (10 December 2020)

The panel found that the complainant had established all three elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name to the complainant.

Citation
[2020] DRS 23052
Parties
Complainant: Compagnie Générale Des Etablissements Michelin; Respondent: Nadine Elghool
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
10 December 2020
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Decision
Outcome
Domain name transferred to complainant
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Compagnie Générale Des Etablissements Michelin

Complainant

Nadine Elghool

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a trademark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant had established all three elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name to the complainant.

Court Disposition

Domain name transferred to complainant

Orders

  • Transfer of the disputed domain name to the complainant