Chauhan v Revenue & Customs [2011] UKFTT 412 (TC) (24 June 2011)

Chauhan v Revenue & Customs [2011] UKFTT 412 (TC) (24 June 2011)

HMRC’s assessments and penalties were generally confirmed but amended to reflect more accurate profit allocations, allowable expenses, and appropriate penalty abatements; emotional trauma did not constitute legal excuse for non-compliance.

Citation
[2011] UKFTT 412
Parties
Appellant: Naresh Chauhan; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
24 June 2011
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; assessments and penalties amended.
Legal Topics
Income Tax, Self Employment Notification, Capital Gains Tax, Penalties for Incorrect Returns, Discovery Assessments

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 11
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Naresh Chauhan

Appellant

The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision

  1. 1 Failure to notify commencement of self-employment
  2. 2 Failure to return profits and capital gains
  3. 3 Correctness of HMRC assessments and penalties

Ratio Decidendi

HMRC’s assessments and penalties were generally confirmed but amended to reflect more accurate profit allocations, allowable expenses, and appropriate penalty abatements; emotional trauma did not constitute legal excuse for non-compliance.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; assessments and penalties amended.

Orders

  • Assessments and amendments to self-assessments confirmed subject to specified reductions.
  • Penalties confirmed subject to increased abatements and recalculation.