Chauhan v Revenue & Customs [2011] UKFTT 412 (TC) (24 June 2011)
HMRC’s assessments and penalties were generally confirmed but amended to reflect more accurate profit allocations, allowable expenses, and appropriate penalty abatements; emotional trauma did not constitute legal excuse for non-compliance.
- Citation
- [2011] UKFTT 412
- Parties
- Appellant: Naresh Chauhan; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; assessments and penalties amended.
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Self Employment Notification, Capital Gains Tax, Penalties for Incorrect Returns, Discovery Assessments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Naresh Chauhan
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Failure to notify commencement of self-employment
- 2 Failure to return profits and capital gains
- 3 Correctness of HMRC assessments and penalties
Ratio Decidendi
HMRC’s assessments and penalties were generally confirmed but amended to reflect more accurate profit allocations, allowable expenses, and appropriate penalty abatements; emotional trauma did not constitute legal excuse for non-compliance.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; assessments and penalties amended.
Orders
- Assessments and amendments to self-assessments confirmed subject to specified reductions.
- Penalties confirmed subject to increased abatements and recalculation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment