Miss L Pearce v Nature's Nursery (Ascot) Ltd: (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Maternity and Pregnancy Rights : Sex Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2017] UKET 3303025/2015 (20 February 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant's rights in relation to unfair dismissal, sex discrimination, maternity and pregnancy, breach of contract, and unlawful deduction from wages had been breached.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 3303025/2015
Parties: Claimant: Miss L Pearce; Respondent: Nature's Nursery (Ascot) Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 20 February 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Judgment for the claimant
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, Maternity and Pregnancy Rights, Sex Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages

Employment Law Breach of Contract Maternity and Pregnancy Rights Sex Discrimination Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction From Wages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Miss L Pearce

Claimant

Nature's Nursery (Ascot) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
2 Whether there was sex discrimination
3 Whether there was a breach of contract

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant's rights in relation to unfair dismissal, sex discrimination, maternity and pregnancy, breach of contract, and unlawful deduction from wages had been breached.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant

Orders

The respondent is ordered to pay compensation to the claimant for unfair dismissal, sex discrimination, breach of contract, and unlawful deduction from wages.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.