Lyon v Revenue and Customs (Late appeal - Martland considered - length of delay - whether good reason for delay - whether late appeal appropriate in all the circumstances) [2025] UKFTT 920 (TC) (31 July 2025)

Lyon v Revenue and Customs (Late appeal - Martland considered - length of delay - whether good reason for delay - whether late appeal appropriate in all the circumstances) [2025] UKFTT 920 (TC) (31 July 2025)

The appellant failed to provide a good reason for a serious and significant delay in appealing the Personal Liability Notice. The June Letter was not proven to have been sent or received, and even if it had been, it did not constitute a valid appeal under the statutory requirements. The balance of prejudice and the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] UKFTT 920
Parties
Appellant: Neil Lyon; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
31 July 2025
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal (first Tier Tribunal) / Application for Permission to Make a Late Appeal
Outcome
Application for permission to make a late appeal refused; appeal not admitted.
Legal Topics
Late Appeals, Personal Liability Notice, National Insurance Contributions, Director's Liability, Procedural Time Limits
Tax Law Social Security Law Late Appeals Personal Liability Notice National Insurance Contributions Director's Liability Procedural Time Limits

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Neil Lyon

Appellant

The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Tax Appeal (first Tier Tribunal) / Application for Permission to Make a Late Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant should be granted permission to make a late appeal against a Personal Liability Notice for Class 1 National Insurance Contributions
  2. 2 Whether there was a good reason for the delay in appealing
  3. 3 Whether the June Letter constituted a valid and timeous appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to provide a good reason for a serious and significant delay in appealing the Personal Liability Notice. The June Letter was not proven to have been sent or received, and even if it had been, it did not constitute a valid appeal under the statutory requirements. The balance of prejudice and the need to respect statutory time limits weighed against granting permission for a late appeal.

Court Disposition

Application for permission to make a late appeal refused; appeal not admitted.

Orders

  • Permission to notify the appeal late is refused.
  • The appeal is not admitted.