Royal Marines -v- O'Neil [2002] DRS 401 (15 July 2002)
Complainant failed to establish rights in the name 'Royal Marines' and failed to prove the domain name was an Abusive Registration; Respondent's demonstrable preparations for legitimate use and lack of evidence of confusion or unfair advantage support dismissal.
- Citation
- [2002] DRS 401
- Parties
- Complainant: Royal Marines; Respondent: Neil O'Neil
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Decision
- Outcome
- Complaint dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Registration, Passing Off, Trade Mark Rights, Abusive Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Royal Marines
Complainant
Neil O'Neil
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Complainant has rights in the name 'Royal Marines' identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name in the hands of the Respondent is an Abusive Registration
Ratio Decidendi
Complainant failed to establish rights in the name 'Royal Marines' and failed to prove the domain name was an Abusive Registration; Respondent's demonstrable preparations for legitimate use and lack of evidence of confusion or unfair advantage support dismissal.
Court Disposition
Complaint dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment