Pattullo v Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 841 (TC) (26 August 2014)
The Tribunal found that HMRC made a valid discovery under s29(1) TMA 1970 following the Court of Appeal decision in Drummond, but the hypothetical officer could not reasonably have been expected to be aware of the insufficiency of tax at the closure of the enquiry window based on information in the appellant's return; thus, the condition in s29(5) was not satisfied and the assessment was invalid.
- Citation
- [2014] UKFTT 841 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Neil Pattullo; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Capital Gains Tax Discovery Assessment Appeal / Final Judgment by First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Discovery Assessment, Capital Gains Tax, Tax Avoidance Schemes, Res Judicata, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Neil Pattullo
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Capital Gains Tax Discovery Assessment Appeal / Final Judgment by First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber)
Legal Issues
- 1 Validity of discovery assessment under TMA 1970 s29
- 2 Whether HMRC officer could reasonably have been expected to be aware of chargeable gains or excessive relief
- 3 Whether issue of validity is res judicata
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that HMRC made a valid discovery under s29(1) TMA 1970 following the Court of Appeal decision in Drummond, but the hypothetical officer could not reasonably have been expected to be aware of the insufficiency of tax at the closure of the enquiry window based on information in the appellant's return; thus, the condition in s29(5) was not satisfied and the assessment was invalid.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Assessment raised by HMRC declared invalid as s29(5) TMA 1970 condition not satisfied
- No amendment to grounds of appeal permitted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment