Proffitt v Revenue & Customs (VAT - BUILDERS : Do -it-yourself) [2020] UKFTT 120 (TC) (28 February 2020)
The Tribunal held that the dwelling was not completed until the necessary certificates (electrical, gas safe, and Completion Certificate) were issued, demonstrating that the building was safe, hygienic, and habitable in accordance with planning permission and Building Regulations. The claim was made within three months of the Completion Certificate, and thus was in time under Regulation 201. The Tribunal preferred the approach in Fraser, requiring demonstration of completion by appropriate certification, but noted that each case turns on its facts.
- Citation
- [2020] UKFTT 120 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Neil Proffitt; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- VAT DIY House Builders Scheme Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Substantive Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Value Added Tax, DIY House Builders Scheme, Time Limits for Claims, Completion of Building, Documentary Evidence Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Neil Proffitt
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT DIY House Builders Scheme Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Substantive Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Proffitt’s claim for VAT refund under the DIY House Builders scheme was made within the statutory time limit under Regulation 201 of the VAT Regulations 1995.
- 2 How 'completion of the building' should be determined for the purposes of the time limit in Regulation 201.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that the dwelling was not completed until the necessary certificates (electrical, gas safe, and Completion Certificate) were issued, demonstrating that the building was safe, hygienic, and habitable in accordance with planning permission and Building Regulations. The claim was made within three months of the Completion Certificate, and thus was in time under Regulation 201. The Tribunal preferred the approach in Fraser, requiring demonstration of completion by appropriate certification, but noted that each case turns on its facts.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- HMRC to accept and process Mr Proffitt’s DIY Self-Build VAT refund claim as valid.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment