Mr V Staines v Netbox Digital Ltd (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Disability Discrimination : Race Discrimination : Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2017] UKET 2300466/2017 (28 July 2017)
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully deducted wages and discriminated against the claimant on the grounds of disability and race, constituting a breach of contract and violations under the Equality Act 2010.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 2300466/2017
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr V Staines; Respondent: Netbox Digital Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld in part
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Disability Discrimination, Race Discrimination, Unlawful Deduction From Wages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Mr V Staines
Claimant
Netbox Digital Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent breached the claimant's contract of employment
- 2 Whether the respondent discriminated against the claimant on grounds of disability
- 3 Whether the respondent discriminated against the claimant on grounds of race
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully deducted wages and discriminated against the claimant on the grounds of disability and race, constituting a breach of contract and violations under the Equality Act 2010.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld in part
Orders
- Respondent to pay compensation to the claimant for unlawful deduction from wages and discrimination
- Respondent to provide a written apology to the claimant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment