ADP Dealer Services UK Limited v Network Needs Limited (Full Decision _No Action) [2013] DRS 13009 (07 October 2013)

ADP Dealer Services UK Limited v Network Needs Limited (Full Decision _No Action) [2013] DRS 13009 (07 October 2013)

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the domain name registration was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Citation
[2013] DRS 13009
Parties
Complainant: ADP Dealer Services UK Limited; Respondent: Network Needs Limited
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
07 October 2013
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Outcome
Complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ADP Dealer Services UK Limited

Complainant

Network Needs Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the domain name registration was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint denied

Orders

  • No action to be taken regarding the domain name