Olatunji v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd (Practice and Procedure : Costs) [2012] UKEAT 0553_11_1009 (10 September 2012)
The Tribunal erred by failing to consider the Claimant's ability to pay and not providing reasons for its costs order; the appeal is allowed and the costs order is reduced to £750 based on the Claimant's financial circumstances.
- Citation
- [2012] UKEAT 0553_11_1009
- Parties
- Claimant: Miss Olatunji; Respondent: Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; original costs order set aside and replaced.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders, Ability to Pay, Strike Out, Unreasonable Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miss Olatunji
Claimant
Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in failing to consider the Claimant's ability to pay when making a costs order
- 2 Whether the Claimant provided sufficient reasons to avoid a costs order
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal erred by failing to consider the Claimant's ability to pay and not providing reasons for its costs order; the appeal is allowed and the costs order is reduced to £750 based on the Claimant's financial circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; original costs order set aside and replaced.
Orders
- Claimant to pay Respondent £750 in costs by 10 March 2013
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment