Next Group Plc v Revenue & Customs [2011] UKFTT 122 (TC) (16 February 2011)
The Brochure was not supplied for consideration; the charge and delivery credit were marketing devices, and the payment received was consideration for the taxable supply of delivered goods. The arrangements were not abusive as the principal aim was commercial, not tax avoidance. Some VAT assessments were made out of time and are invalid.
- Citation
- [2011] UKFTT 122 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Next Group Plc; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- VAT Consideration, Zero Rating, Abusive Arrangements, Time Limits for VAT Assessments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Next Group Plc
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Brochure was supplied for consideration under VAT law
- 2 Whether the arrangements constituted an abusive practice
- 3 Whether VAT assessments were made within statutory time limits
Ratio Decidendi
The Brochure was not supplied for consideration; the charge and delivery credit were marketing devices, and the payment received was consideration for the taxable supply of delivered goods. The arrangements were not abusive as the principal aim was commercial, not tax avoidance. Some VAT assessments were made out of time and are invalid.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- VAT assessments relating to periods outside statutory time limits are invalid
- VAT assessments within time limits are upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment