Mr A McIntosh v NHS Greater Glasgow (Scotland : Equal Pay Act) [2017] UKET 111646/2006 (12 April 2017)
The Tribunal determined whether the claimant was paid less than comparators for equal work and whether the respondent could justify any pay difference under the Equal Pay Act.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 111646/2006
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr A McIntosh; Respondent: NHS Greater Glasgow
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment delivered; outcome not specified in the provided text.
- Legal Topics
- Equal Pay, Discrimination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr A McIntosh
Claimant
NHS Greater Glasgow
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant received equal pay for equal work under the Equal Pay Act
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal determined whether the claimant was paid less than comparators for equal work and whether the respondent could justify any pay difference under the Equal Pay Act.
Court Disposition
Judgment delivered; outcome not specified in the provided text.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment