Ms H McIlliven v NHS Greater Glasgow: (Scotland : Equal Pay Act) [2017] UKET 111499/2006 (5 April 2017)

The tribunal determined that the claimant was entitled to equal pay as her work was of equal value to that of male comparators and no valid justification for the pay disparity was provided.

Citation: [2017] UKET 111499/2006
Parties: Claimant: Ms H McIlliven; Respondent: NHS Greater Glasgow
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 05 April 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Equal Pay, Discrimination

Employment Law Equal Pay Discrimination

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Ms H McIlliven

Claimant

NHS Greater Glasgow

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was entitled to equal pay under the Equal Pay Act

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal determined that the claimant was entitled to equal pay as her work was of equal value to that of male comparators and no valid justification for the pay disparity was provided.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

Respondent to pay claimant the difference in pay for the relevant period
Respondent to ensure compliance with Equal Pay Act