Markos v Simia Farra & Co [1993] UKEAT 539_91_1111 (11 November 1993)
The Originating Application was not presented within the statutory three-month time limit, and there was no error of law or perversity in the Tribunal's refusal to extend time on just and equitable grounds.
- Citation
- [1993] UKEAT 539_91_1111
- Parties
- Appellant: Nicholas Markos; Respondent: Commission for Racial Equality
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal Against Preliminary Decision on Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Redundancy, Jurisdiction, Limitation Period
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Nicholas Markos
Appellant
Commission for Racial Equality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal Against Preliminary Decision on Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Originating Application was presented within the statutory time limit under S.68(1) of the Race Relations Act 1976
- 2 Whether it was just and equitable to extend time under S.68(6) of the Race Relations Act 1976
Ratio Decidendi
The Originating Application was not presented within the statutory three-month time limit, and there was no error of law or perversity in the Tribunal's refusal to extend time on just and equitable grounds.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment