Arla Foods Amba v Nick Hiscox (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 18417 (06 April 2017)
The panel found that the complainant had rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name and that the registration was abusive. The domain name was ordered to be transferred to the complainant.
- Citation
- [2017] DRS 18417
- Parties
- Complainant: Arla Foods Amba; Respondent: Nick Hiscox
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 06 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
- Outcome
- Domain name transferred to complainant
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Transfer, Abusive Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Arla Foods Amba
Complainant
Nick Hiscox
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name was an abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy
- 2 Whether the complainant had rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
Ratio Decidendi
The panel found that the complainant had rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name and that the registration was abusive. The domain name was ordered to be transferred to the complainant.
Court Disposition
Domain name transferred to complainant
Orders
- Transfer of the disputed domain name to the complainant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment