Grogan v Revenue & Customs [2009] UKFTT 238 (TC) (14 September 2009)
The original notice under ICTA 1988 s.703(3) was invalid as no notice was served before 6 April 2007; the notice under ITA 2007 s.698 was effective. The Tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities, that obtaining a tax advantage was a main object of the transactions, and the escape clause did not apply. The appeal was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2009] UKFTT 238 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Nigel P Grogan; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Transaction in Securities, Employee Share Ownership Trusts (quest), Income Tax Advantage, Counteraction Notices, Main Object Test
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nigel P Grogan
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Income Tax Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Validity of counteraction notice under ICTA 1988 s.703(3) versus ITA 2007 s.698
- 2 Whether a tax advantage was obtained
- 3 Whether obtaining a tax advantage was a main object of the transactions
Ratio Decidendi
The original notice under ICTA 1988 s.703(3) was invalid as no notice was served before 6 April 2007; the notice under ITA 2007 s.698 was effective. The Tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities, that obtaining a tax advantage was a main object of the transactions, and the escape clause did not apply. The appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Notice under ITA 2007 s.698 upheld
- Assessment to income tax confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment