Cimpax ApS v NJ Dynamic Solutions (Full Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 16995 (13 April 2016)

Cimpax ApS v NJ Dynamic Solutions (Full Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 16995 (13 April 2016)

The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy, warranting a transfer of the domain name.

Citation
[2016] DRS 16995
Parties
Complainant: Cimpax ApS; Respondent: NJ Dynamic Solutions
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
13 April 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Outcome
Domain name transferred to complainant
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Bad Faith Registration
Intellectual Property Domain Name Law Domain Name Dispute Passing Off Bad Faith Registration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cimpax ApS

Complainant

NJ Dynamic Solutions

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive
  2. 2 Whether the complainant has rights in the name
  3. 3 Whether the respondent has legitimate interests in the domain name

Ratio Decidendi

The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy, warranting a transfer of the domain name.

Court Disposition

Domain name transferred to complainant

Orders

  • Transfer of the domain name to Cimpax ApS