Miss C Richardson v Norfolk County Hotels Ltd (England and Wales : Sexual Orientation Discrimination/Transexualism) [2019] UKET 3303939/2018 (2 August 2019)

The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to less favourable treatment because of her transgender status, amounting to unlawful discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2019] UKET 3303939/2018
Parties: Claimant: Miss C Richardson; Respondent: Norfolk County Hotels Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 02 August 2019
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Sexual Orientation Discrimination, Transgender Rights, Unfair Dismissal

Employment Law Equality Law Sexual Orientation Discrimination Transgender Rights Unfair Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Miss C Richardson

Claimant

Norfolk County Hotels Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was subjected to discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and/or gender reassignment
2 Whether the respondent's actions constituted unlawful discrimination under the Equality Act 2010

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to less favourable treatment because of her transgender status, amounting to unlawful discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

Respondent to pay compensation to the claimant for unlawful discrimination

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.