Eden and Others v. North-Eastern Railway Co. [1907] UKHL 626 (09 July 1907)
The correct measure of compensation under section 78 is the value of the coal which the railway company requires to be left unworked, i.e., the profit that would have been made by working it in the ordinary course, not merely the increased expenses or loss from working other coal. The compensation is to be apportioned between lessor and lessee according to their respective interests.
- Citation
- [1907] UKHL 626
- Parties
- Appellants: Eden and Others; Respondent: North-Eastern Railway Company
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 1907
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / House of Lords Judgment on Appeal From Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment of Bigham, J. restored.
- Legal Topics
- Compensation for Minerals Left Unworked, Measure of Compensation Under Statutory Powers, Railways Clauses Consolidation Act 1845 Section 78, Apportionment Between Lessor and Lessee
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eden and Others
Appellants
North-Eastern Railway Company
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / House of Lords Judgment on Appeal From Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the correct measure of compensation payable by a railway company under section 78 of the Railways Clauses Consolidation Act 1845 when it requires coal to be left unworked for support of the railway?
- 2 Should compensation be limited to increased expenses and loss from working substituted coal, or should it be the profit/value of the coal left unworked?
Ratio Decidendi
The correct measure of compensation under section 78 is the value of the coal which the railway company requires to be left unworked, i.e., the profit that would have been made by working it in the ordinary course, not merely the increased expenses or loss from working other coal. The compensation is to be apportioned between lessor and lessee according to their respective interests.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment of Bigham, J. restored.
Orders
- Judgment of Court of Appeal reversed.
- Judgment of Bigham, J. restored.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment