Mr BC Caisley v Northumberland Fire and Rescue Service (England and Wales : Part Time Workers) [2017] UKET 6400887/2001 (12 October 2017)
The tribunal found that the claimant was treated less favourably than comparable full-time workers and that the respondent failed to provide objective justification for such treatment, thus breaching the Regulations.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 6400887/2001
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr BC Caisley; Respondent: Northumberland Fire and Rescue Service
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Part Time Workers, Employment Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr BC Caisley
Claimant
Northumberland Fire and Rescue Service
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant, as a part-time worker, was treated less favourably than comparable full-time workers in breach of the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant was treated less favourably than comparable full-time workers and that the respondent failed to provide objective justification for such treatment, thus breaching the Regulations.
Court Disposition
claim upheld
Orders
- Respondent to compensate the claimant for less favourable treatment
- Respondent to review employment practices to ensure compliance with the Regulations
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment